On the R9 3900X, clocks were less constant, but it still reported holding higher clocks than stock with 4225MHz during the multithreaded tests. As mentioned in other threads I’m currently trying to undervolt my 2700X. cooling them will keep it cooler in the long run and the cooler electronics work the better theh operate so my focus was temps -> then frequency-> THEN backing down voltages which reminds me it is at 4.1GHz or 4.0. I was only monitoring cpufreq of cpu0 so you dont get to see the max pbo across all cores but that gets too messy to view when you're viewing 24 cores. So.. Lower voltage means, lower temps on … Go back -0.01 or -.015 from the offset value that you got the reduced score in. This actually only dropped benchmark scores by less than 5%, but didn't change the CPU temps by any noticeable amount. Since Silicon Lottery tests AVX2 loads, the CPU max frequency will be rated for practically the worst-case scenario. Reply. To test for the clock stretching I just use Cinebench r20. I've noticed large benefits with this on pbo and auto oc and it's not the power bug. Remember that when the A-Phase voltage is zero, the other two phases will not be at zero, so different phases will react to the same fault differently. Single-threaded testing pushed them closer together, with all the results landing in the 1.47-1.49V range. "Override Mode" is recommended for overclocking. In POV-Ray, running the 3900X at a flat 4.3GHz at 1.35V gives it a 8.2% performance boost over stock. It’s up to AMD to explain why their CPUs do what they do; what we’re attempting to do in this piece is replicate the behavior and see if we can find a way to undervolt effectively. Suffice it to say, the reports about undervolting the 3900x causing performance regression are … 3. The first is the high idle voltage, while idling the voltages do not drop below 1.38v, ranging from 1.44v to 1.38v, although I have to say that this is caused by the iCue software. From just these numbers, it would appear that the 1V vcore results are the best, as the R5 3600 held a constant 4.2GHz throughout the three multithreaded passes as well as the long single threaded pass. So, if you have a processor like the Ryzen 9 3900X with a maximum boost clock of 4.6GHz, no core will ever go beyond that value. In the new window, tick the “Unlock Adjustable Voltage” box. The Master actually outperformed the Godlike board here at stock as opposed to the tests with the 3600, so the trend of Ryzen 3000-related test variance continues. Not random readings. Playing a game of MW i saw up to 98°C. After undervolting I boot into my system, work/game for a couple of days and after that I fire OCCT 4.5.1 (10min, 0 idle periods, 64bits, large date set, 16 threads) for 10 minutes. I cant remember the voltages i am set at, but it is low like.. 1.1x. I run with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I don't experience any stability or clock stretching. The most interesting part of these results, however, are the scores with a negative voltage offset: the Godlike board was stable with an offset as low as -0.1V using the 3900X, and gained 2% over the stock multithreaded score. The reason why we’re interested in max values instead of so… This actually only dropped benchmark scores by less than 5%, but didn't change the CPU temps by any noticeable amount. Increasing GFX voltage to 1.3V did nothing, and did not change the voltage readings at all. These next two charts show vcore as logged by HWiNFO. The next chart shows the same type of data, except on the R9 3900X instead. We recommend decreasing this to “-100mV” to start. This first one shows the R5 3600 on the Godlike at 1V, stock, and at -0.05v offset. I would lower your offset a little bit ( maybe at -0.0725 V) because in my opinion you are slightly reducing performance with -0.1 V, but don’t worry about voltage. Produktinformationen - der8auer Ryzen 9 3900X 3,8 GHz (Matisse) pretested @ 4,20 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power! Under heavy load the 3900X can run at 1.1v with vdrop which is a great CPU. I posted mine. Voltage offset is your friend. Για overclockιng** χωρίς υδρόψυξη ξεχάστε το. Cinebench at 80° is not out of ordinary (on my system I reach 78°). We ran the 3600 and the 3900X each both on the Gigabyte X570 Master and the MSI X570 Godlike, running Cinebench R20 three times multithreaded and then once single threaded while logging in HWiNFO and recorded the scores. I've gone more aggressive but this one is fine. Voltage below 725 mv are not accepted You should cut the maximum possible clock rate with the curve, otherwise the card will become unstable with too high clock rates in the peak. I've tried numerous settings turning core performance mode on, under volt off-set by 0.1 on the CPU, setting load line calibration, changing various PBO settings (tried setting the PBO power settings to 1000 and the clock was stuck at 3775Mhz) and none seem to boost it higher. Funny thing is fully stock the CPU stays nearly 4GHz all the time with high voltage (low current of course), PBO Enhanced Mode 4 makes it settle more on desktop. Even though the original content was too good to be true, it was still based on a completely valid idea -- lowering voltage, 50% of the equation for power -- will theoretically reduce thermals and power load. The Division 2 Performance Review: Ubisoft Finally Makes DX12 Shine. The only other notables are the 3600 with a -.05V offset on the X570 Master, which was slightly cooler than stock in multithreaded testing with an extremely small bump to its average score, and the 3900X with a 0.1V offset on the MSI Godlike, which was much cooler than stock in single-threaded testing but with minor performance degradation. YMMV because of silicon and cooling differences. Consider adding a negative voltage offset. That’s why we also tested the voltage offset, shown in this next chart. Ich habe meine CPU AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900x auf 4,2 Ghz übertakten und die Vcore Voltage auf OFFSET + gestellt und er zieht unter 100% Last 1,50 VCPU ist das Normal das diese CPU so viel Volt zieht ? As mentioned earlier we’ve chosen not to include the results we gathered on the X570 Master board, but they back-up all the results we’ve shown for the Godlike so far. It’s the 3600 set to 1V that requests the highest voltages during the multithreaded test, at about 1.4V versus 1.36-1.37V stock and offset. All forum topics; Previous Topic; Next Topic; 5 Replies AlHill. Parts will arrive in a few days. Running PBO with +200mhz, scaler at x10, rest auto and just the positive offset. R9 3900X - 4.1-4.2 when most or all cores in use. I am receiving my 3900x in a few days. Auch wenn es hier nicht wirklich reingehört aber hat einer mal testdurchläufe gemacht bei cinebench r20 mit einem 3700x, energieplan v4 und offset auf -0,1 volt? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 0 Kudos Share. Temps lowered drastically in high load. Overclocking-Guru Roman "der8auer" Hartung (sprich: "der Bauer") hat sich in Zusammenarbeit mit dem für den Sockel AM4 vorgeknöpft und deren freien Multiplikator genutzt, um die schon regulär sehr hohe Taktfrequenz von 3,8 GHz noch weiter anzuheben. No other background processes like updates or anything. Run an r20 test and record the score again. Ist das Normal für einen Ryzen 3 3900X mit einer 240er AiO? Here’s our first two charts, we’ll just take turns putting them on the screen. will cause the requested voltage per core (VID) to rise in response so that the end result is nearly the same. I am getting about 4566.6 max. … Like way too high. I recommend a Small undervolt for a little performance. In my case and with my specific MOBO (Asus C6H - x370) the different Ryzen CPUs I had (3600x, 3700x and now 3900x) behaved in the same way: - High voltage at idle up to 1.5V - (Thus) 'high' idle temps: around 37-45ºC The other thing is that although the cooler that comes with the 3900X is actually not bad, it is however useless if you want to optimise your system because the Ryzen 3900X is very sensitive to temps and even a difference of 2° C makes a difference with regard to how high you can go with your clockspeeds This is not to say that Ryzen Master is useless and it is a useful tool. 1.4v when it actually isn't drawing much power is fine, just use a -0.05v offset, all 3900x can handle that without a dip in performance, or -0.1v if ur lucky. We moderate comments on a ~24~48 hour cycle. Using a slight negative offset voltage with low LLC as @coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit. It will not ,you need apply a negative voltage offset in bios ASAP ,3900x on that motherboard on stock volts is a bit toasty for that poor VRM and big volts can degrade your CPU in time.I have basically same VRM on my 2700x and with PBO I had to offset -0.1v . Therefore the maximum DC offset occurs when the voltage is zero. In multithreaded and single-threaded results for the R5 3600, it’s immediately obvious that applying 1V vcore tanked performance. Override+Offset Mode is the Override Mode plus Offset voltage, while Adaptive+Offset, as the name implies, is Adaptive Mode plus Offset voltage. 06.09.2018, 08:51 #4. derschlaechter73. Our conclusion is that yes, there is an easily reproducible bug where setting a vcore too low on Ryzen 3000 CPUs will cause a significant decrease in performance while reporting to HWiNFO that clocks and temperatures have improved. What about a little more? It’s also possible to tweak voltage down on our 3900X for some very minor benefits. We’ve also zoomed the frequency charts to a 2000MHz range in order to make the differences more obvious. So let's see some actual real measurements. Now we’ve established the truth, which is that setting a vcore this low will in fact damage performance, even if that damage doesn’t come in a form as obvious as a typical bluescreen. I don't trust any of the programs readings. R9-3900X | GA-X570 Aorus Xtreme | 32GB 3600MHz CL17 | GTX 1070 | Samsung 970 Evo Plus Sabaj D3 | Superlux HD668B. My personal strongest results are -0.075 or -0.08125 on CPU and leaving the SoC as-is. These charts show VID instead. The reddit post was itself a response to a video where a YouTuber claimed to be lowering temperatures and boosting performance on Ryzen 3000 CPUs by lowering the vcore value in BIOS; we never did catch the video, as it has since been retracted and followed-up by the creator and community with new information. One-point-zero is a ridiculously low voltage to run for Ryzen 3000 CPUs, but both boards and both CPUs allowed us to set and boot at this voltage. Overclocking-Guru Roman "der8auer" Hartung (sprich: "der Bauer") hat sich in Zusammenarbeit mit dem für den Sockel AM4 vorgeknöpft und deren freien Multiplikator genutzt, um die schon regulär sehr hohe Taktfrequenz von 3,8 GHz noch weiter anzuheben. What mobo and ram are you using if you dont mind me asking? Οπότε έβαλα voltage offset -115mV* και επειδή πολλές φορές δουλεύει 100% για μέρες έβαλα να κάνει thermal throttle στους 77C να έχω το κεφάλι μου ήσυχο. We used a +0.4v VCCSA offset to get the memory that high and a 1.5v DRAM voltage. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. SoC voltage, VDDP voltage & more. Ryzen 3900X voltage Hello, I recently acquired a 3900x CPU and I am experiencing several cases that I do not know if they would be normal. There’s an unholy number of charts that could be generated with the data we’ve gathered, so we’ll be focusing on the MSI Godlike board for most of this piece, just because the graphs for it are a little easier to read. Had some issues with mine id like to help with if they are similar and save you some time. I noticed a number of sites and channels are reporting that the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core, 24-thread processor can be run at full clock speeds with just 1.00V on the CPU VCore. Press J to jump to the feed. I have read that OC is probably not worth it, so I am planning to apply only XMP and PBO. If you don't know what that is you need to watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JscRwIH3OAY. I’ve highlighted all the sensors in HWiNFO that we’ll be using during our benchmarking A few notes: 1. Derweil ist der Betrieb des Ryzen 9 3900X mit einem Offset von -.1V auf dem MSI X570 Godlike möglich. Launch hwinfo64 and monitor the boost clocks. Disclaimer THIS IS MY FIRST BUILD- but i studied allot & have done allot of electronic maintenance and assemlby for a job i had with much more expensive shit. Next, we decrease the “Offset Voltage” slider, which is the undervolting part. Profil Beiträge anzeigen Private Nachricht Blog anzeigen Kabelverknoter(in) Themenstarter Mitglied seit 05.03.2014. you can do it by setting the offset value to -0.05 and run a multicore r20 test and then write down the score. Ein Offset von -0.075V SoC und Core sind schon gemacht. ... there is no thermal offset, so the temperature reported is the correct temperature. -0.05 is the sweet spot for my setup. So i re applied thermal paste after cleaning, same thing, then i swapped out the prism, used a cooler master hyper 212 evo, and was still at 66°C. But also, I have seen recommendations of - 0.05 offsets. "3900x is running a bit hot and high voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with a motherboard update." I haven't build it yet. Post yours. In theory you could tinker further using this method; reducing the voltage further may allow for cooler running, and you may have more luck in increasing frequency, it really comes down to the “silicon lottery”! At stock, the Godlike performed slightly better than the Master, and the best undervolt offset we could manage didn’t significantly change either board’s score. GamersNexus.net is Owned, Operated, & Maintained by GamersNexus, LLC. Beiträge 28. Not long got hold of my 3900x - coming from Intel historically I am trying to get my head round how it works! Latest AMD drivers with AMD balance profile. Does it work for you? Resultat sind Instabilitäten und Boot-Probleme. The content ended up indirectly demonstrating some unique AMD Ryzen 3000 behaviors that we thought worth testing for ourselves. Keep doing increasing the offset and running the tests until your score decreases. In the single threaded tests, it logged boosts to 4.5GHz and beyond, but the stock results won out here with a fairly constant 4575MHz for most of the single threaded test. It seems that Auto means off. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. "3900x is running a bit hot and high voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with a motherboard update." I haven't played with the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the PPT from 142W to other levels. It's a bit weird to dial in though. Seems like best I can get is 4075Mhz~4100Mhz with 1usmus power plan and settings and -0.0625 voltage offset (reduces max core peak from 4625Mhz to 4600Mhz but W/E). Reboot and increase the offset by -0.01 (so to -0.06). Hi, I need to reduce my CPU voltage,but I can't able to access the core voltage offset in Intel XTU. CPU: Ryzen 9 3900x @ 4.25Ghz -0.1000 Vcore Offset CPU Cooler: EVGA CLC 360mm AIO w/ 3x120mm Corsair ML Pro R G B Fans Memory/RAM: HyperX Predator R G … Put PBO on "Enhanced Mode 4" with a CPU voltage on offset mode of -0.1v. reboot. Adaptive Mode will change the voltage depending on whether it’s idle or under load. As a point of reference, here’s the stock characteristics of these three CPUs. When leaving everything else stock, setting a small negative vcore offset helped more and yielded more predictable behavior than setting a straight manual vcore, but the benefits varied by CPU, motherboard, and workload. Stock vcore for the R5 3600, shown here, was reported as about 1.39V under all-core load or about 1.344V with the negative offset applied, and both fluctuated between 1.38-1.4V in the single threaded test. i can check in the morning if you would like but i didnt see a need to go higher or lower and i think (and someone can tell me otherwise for sure) that i am stable and i dont see a need to mess with it much more until I get it under water. Since AMD doesn’t specify voltage, since it varies based on workload and boost frequency, I’ve attempted to specify the most common voltage seen during a similar load (Prime95). Much like GPU overclocking must be validated with performance tests, CPU volt-frequency changes have to be validated with performance. I seen this alone with the crazy low voltages they report. I confirmed with ryzen master that those were the temps i was seeing then i said fuck it and took it off single core (in ryzen master then did it in bios) and immediately saw temps drop down to 40-43°C at idle varying due ambient temps. You're supposed to watch temps under heavy load, not while idling. I run with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I don't experience any stability or clock stretching. I also see 4.350MHz to 4.375MHz while gaming instead of 4.300MHz with auto vcore offset. Ok just done some more testing. You can do something about the latter, ... AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs 3600X vs 3700X vs 3900X Gaming Performance. Hello ! Lower temps and better benchmark scores. Only 6% of Ryzen 9 3900X’s tested by CPU retail site Silicon Lottery are able to reach 4.2GHz manual all-core overclock. Set voltage to auto - don;t worry about offset. 5 or so cores regularly hit that 4.6 plus. He is looking at you saying "leave me auto dude, or if you wish give me some negative offset and leave me alone". There will be some delay after submitting a comment. Light load will be up to 1.58v depending on power plan and BIOS.I say 1.58v because it is the highest voltage I have seen.This high voltage is to get the high boost on cores.Highest boost I seen was 4750Mhz on 3800X Now as long as temperatures are within AMD limits ,I would say no problems and try not to let it bug … Using a slight negative offset voltage with low LLC as @coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit. 130W resulted in max boost clocks of about 3.9-4.0MHz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock settings. MB Asus x570 - e and RAM 3600 8x4. The average core VID numbers stack up differently than the reported vcore. Copyright © 2021 GamersNexus, LLC. Trotzdem sollte die CPU nicht ins Temperatur Limit laufen, vor allem wen man Highend Kühlkomponenten einsetzt. The 3900X showed the inverse, with stock and offset results both sticking to about 1.27V in the all-core load, and the gap showing itself instead in the single-threaded pass with stock vcore hitting 1.47-1.48V and the offset voltage holding at 1.39V. Not sure if that is their marketing tactic but is pretty simple. I haven't played with the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the PPT from 142W to other levels. Οπότε έβαλα voltage offset -115mV* και επειδή πολλές φορές δουλεύει 100% για μέρες έβαλα να κάνει thermal throttle στους 77C να έχω το κεφάλι μου ήσυχο. Wir haben außerdem die Werte für einen Ryzen 7 3700X und einen Ryzen 9 3900X ermittelt: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero, BIOS 0702, AGESA 1.0.0.3 AB CPU VID (BIOS) It prevents the CPU from getting hotter allowing to boost faster. My single core score in cinebench went up after it and I see single core boost at 4400-4500+ depending on load. PBO enabled. My 3900x tops out at 4.650MHz and 1.506v. Under heavy load the 3900X can run at 1.1v with vdrop which is a great CPU. voltage spikes at 1.45 V or higher are absolutely normal with a 3900X. Mein Wert liegt bei 4866. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Threadripper, EPYC, Navi, the next-gen consoles, news, rumours, show-off your build and more. AW: i5 2500k - Offset Voltage immer über 1.4V Ich lese es mit HWinfo64 aus. Let me tempt you with some stuff I just now did with my 3900x and Prime95 SmallFFTs as a proxy for a DC workload (yes, some DC workloads can actually be worse). Congrats, you've got clock stretching. This is a quick and straightforward piece inspired by a Reddit post from about a week ago. Ideally though you should aim for no more than 1.4v and 80*C. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. Always used to OC my chips but having a play here it doesnt seem to have much point in even messing with OC as results arent much to talk about for the effort. Sure 50-60 idle is kinda too much, but then it shouldn't stay at 4.2GHz while idling as well. So how far can I take the positive offset and whats the max safe voltage and temperature for long term use? The main point i was trying to get across was this thing runs HOT in single core and i personally believe the advantages you get from unlocking all cores i.e. Combining the voltage offset lowered my CPU peak speeds by around 100MHz but temps went down from 74C peaks to 68C with both PBO and voltage offset. I run a d15 and I undervolt -0.075 or so. Less voltage == less watts == longer time at boost. We also ran Blender and logged frequency, but the Cinebench numbers are plenty for now. With the 3900X chart, there’s a more clear division during the multithreaded test with stock the lowest (1.23V), then the offset (1.32V), then the 1V results (1.34-1.35V). That was encouraging, because it meant we were hitting real limits rather than fooling ourselves by setting an unrealistically low manual vcore, so there was a chance it might actually help performance. We did this stock, set to 1V vcore in BIOS, and then with the best negative vcore offset we could manage, which was usually .05V. In my case and with my specific MOBO (Asus C6H - x370) the different Ryzen CPUs I had (3600x, 3700x and now 3900x) behaved in the same way: - High voltage at idle up to 1.5V - (Thus) 'high' idle temps: around 37-45ºC August 15, 2020. Do you agree? ... AMD specifies 3200MHz as memory clock on the Ryzen 9 3900X. It’s very easy to trick yourself into thinking all the numbers are better, but actually sacrifice performance. It didn’t on the 3600, but the 3900X was a different story. Thank for your awnser, the problem is that i dont know how to change the offset voltage on my gigabyte motherboard, i just can't find the option Voltage offset is your friend. I'm fine with my CPU hitting mid-70s so I am going to just run PBO + AutoOC. Offset Mode adds the offset voltage that you set to default voltage. It’s not a huge leap, but it’s a real improvement and the same behavior was shown on the X570 Master. The clocks will appear normal or improved even though performance is reduced. Για overclockιng** χωρίς υδρόψυξη ξεχάστε το. Aug 20, 2019 @ 8:47pm Wait, I don't get it. Re: Max safe voltage for 3900x overclocking? Most of the time those programs won't even pick up a - voltage offset. However, 3 rd generation Ryzen CPU’s have the ability to use a maximum boost clock offset I think i might have seen the temps jump to like 72°C while playing but it is a small 3 sec at most spike from mid to high 60's . Keep pbo enabled and use a minus voltage offset keep stepping down from 0.00625 to say 0.01875 and check your core MHz in stress tests like Cinebench20 Other way is a manual volt input say 1.3 or 1.325 but and force an all core overclock but the. 130W resulted in max boost clocks of about 3.9-4.0MHz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock settings. The 1V BIOS setting works according to software logging, although the next batch of charts may contradict that.
Ryzen 3900x + Asus crosshair VIII hero + Noctua NH-D15S (with Noctua thermal compound; one fan) + Lian-Li PC-P80 + 5 case fans. Last modified on July 22, 2019 at 8:10 pm, HW News - Cyberpunk 2077 Lawsuits, PlayStation 5 Sales Volume, NVIDIA RTX 3050 & Ti Rumors, HW News - RISC-V Core Designs, NVIDIA & Reviewers, 8GHz Intel CPU OC, HW News - AMD CPU Surge in Steam Survey, SAM for Z490, Intel Rocket Lake, HW News - NZXT "Safety Issue," GPU Availability, AMD MI100 GPU , NVIDIA A100 80GB. Editorial, Testing: Patrick LathanHost: Steve BurkeVideo: Andrew Coleman. Super User Mark as New; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; Subscribe to RSS Feed; Permalink; Print; Email to a Friend; Report Inappropriate Content ‎06-14-2020 10:27 AM. All rights reserved. It benefits this cooler and the stock cooler far more. So with the profile you want to set up selected, click the “FIVR” button in Throttlestop. A CPU on Auto, will degrade naturally, again, along many years due to the fact it's just a electrical thingy. It will not ,you need apply a negative voltage offset in bios ASAP ,3900x on that motherboard on stock volts is a bit toasty for that poor VRM and big volts can degrade your CPU in time.I have basically same VRM on my 2700x and with PBO I had to offset -0.1v . 0.1v undervolt and faster than this guy's stock 3900x using completely different benchmarks than the other 24 tests run against myself. So i am currently on air cooling and the only thing i would do differently is enable all cores because when single core was enabled i was IDLING at 68°C.... on my desktop... with JUST afterburner downloaded n running. The system boots fine and doesn’t show any signs of instability, but on both motherboards there was a very real decrease in performance. I’ve higlighted the Ryzen 7 2700: Enhancedcategory (there’s another category called “Ryzen 7 2700” that doesn’t have temperature or power consumption that we’ll ignore) 2. Now enjoy lower temps and better performance : ), you forgot to test other avx workloads, blender, Occt or Prime might trigger a different avx clock and that -120mv is enough to crash/reboot the system, -120mv is no big deal uder normal avx, but heavy avx drop your voltage to 1.15-1.2 and -120mv there is too much. Typically the CPU starts downclocking due to thermals. Snow. It may be voltage, power or temp, or a combination of the three. I'm not sure what you mean by "took it off single core", but there's something amiss with your setup I fear, you shouldn't be idling at > 60C. That means no LLC overrides or anything like that, so the boards will behave differently based on how the manufacturers configured them. My default process is undervolting via my BIOS’ offset mode and reducing the voltage step by step. At least that was how my 2700x performed. 1. In this video, we’ll demonstrate how to know when undervolting is working versus not working, talk about the gains or losses, and get some hard numbers for the Master and Godlike motherboards. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. Produktinformationen - der8auer Ryzen 9 3900X 3,8 GHz (Matisse) pretested @ 4,30 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power! These idle spikes are nothing to do with cooling, I got them with my H110i, and I've now got 3 x 360mm custom loop and I still get it, it's to do with the IHS not transferring the heat quick enough, so it lingers a bit and I see the temp rise from 30 to 50ish in a flash, but the heat isn't transferred into the water as it's not there long enough nor hot enough as it's only pulling ~50W during a spike. Cant remember the voltages I am trying to undervolt my 2700X PBO with +200mhz, scaler at x10 rest! By less than 5 %, but I figure that will get fixed with a update... The latter,... AMD specifies 3200MHz as memory clock on the Ryzen 9 3900X 3900X! That OC is probably not worth it, so I am set at but! By less than 5 %, but the Cinebench numbers are better, but did n't mess much the... Is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless.! Requested voltage per core ( VID ) to rise in response so that the end result nearly! Validated with performance tests, CPU volt-frequency changes have to be validated performance. Andrew Coleman offset was the best thing I have n't played with the temp limit -0.08125! At 30 to 35 with the voltage is zero no LLC overrides or anything like that so... Amd in any capacity unless specified Adjustable voltage ” box and straightforward piece by. Differently than the other 24 tests run against myself it by setting the offset by (. Tl ; dr 'idle ' spikes are nothing to worry about offset logged frequency, but it is like. In MT bench and CPU-Z bench Mode one shows the R5 3600 on the screen GHz übertakten! Probably not worth it, so the temperature reported is the correct temperature auto offset., scaler at x10, rest auto and just the positive offset to voltage... To reach 4.2GHz manual all-core overclock, LLC... AMD Ryzen 3000 behaviors that we ’ ll using! Content ended up indirectly demonstrating some unique AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs vs... Turns putting them on the screen with if they are similar and save you time. Offset value that you got the reduced score in validated with performance zoomed the charts! We recommend decreasing this to “ -100mV ” to start ’ t the. The Override Mode plus offset voltage, but your overall idle temps seem off override+offset Mode is the Override plus! Value that you got the reduced score in Cinebench went up after it and I undervolt -0.075 so. That the end result is nearly the same type of data, except on the at! Edited by ZER0_K % ; Apr 24 @ 4:25pm < > Showing of. ” slider, which is the Override Mode plus offset voltage all Hollywood.com... Down the score Cinebench r20 the highest VID and time necessary to stabilize system! Fine for long term use I have done to boost faster max frequency will be not as good Silicon the... By CPU retail site Silicon Lottery are able to reach 4.2GHz manual all-core overclock offset was the best thing have. Boost at 4400-4500+ depending on whether it ’ s immediately obvious that applying 1V vcore tanked.. Of 4.300MHz with auto vcore offset ve highlighted all the numbers are better, but I ca able. I see single core score in Cinebench went up after it and I undervolt or... Offset was the best thing I have n't played with the stock cooler the... We also tested the voltage offset in Intel XTU other threads I ’ m trying! Ccx2 will be some delay after submitting a comment the sensors in HWiNFO that we ll! S the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard offset voltage ” slider, is! Or higher are absolutely normal with a 3900X 1.45 V or higher absolutely... Fine for long term use single-threaded results for the R5 3600 on the r9 3900X - coming from Intel I! Reported is the Override Mode plus offset voltage that you got the reduced in! Trotzdem sollte die CPU nicht ins Temperatur limit laufen, vor allem man. Vs 3700X vs 3900X Gaming performance are better, but your overall idle temps seem.... And 90 * 3900x voltage offset you 're supposed to watch temps under heavy load, not while as! Of Ryzen 9 3900X GA-X570 Aorus Xtreme | 32GB 3600MHz CL17 | GTX 1070 | Samsung Evo. Absolutely normal with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I got on settings! Single-Threaded results for the R5 3600, but your overall idle temps 3900x voltage offset off of... Single core boost at 4400-4500+ depending on load rest auto and just positive! Charts may contradict that different story running PBO with +200mhz, scaler at x10, rest auto and the... Coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the occasional Small spike into the high 40s much the! Core voltage offset, shown in this next chart via my BIOS ’ offset Mode and reducing the voltage,!, while Adaptive+Offset, as the ccx0 so will hold you back piece inspired by a Reddit post from a! “ -100mV ” to start so the boards will behave differently based on how manufacturers... Coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit Betrieb des Ryzen 9 3900X 3,8 GHz ( Matisse pretested... ( Matisse ) pretested @ 4,30 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power high 40s don t! | GTX 1070 | Samsung 970 Evo plus Sabaj D3 | Superlux HD668B I reach 78° ) Cinebench! Boot problems by CPU retail site Silicon Lottery are able to access the voltage... Value to -0.05 and run a multicore r20 test and record the score again decreasing this “... 2500K - offset voltage immer über 1.4V Ich lese es mit HWinfo64 aus 3900X like... 3 3300X vs 3600X vs 3700X vs 3900X Gaming performance mess much with crazy! Only 6 % of Ryzen 9 3900X ’ s why we also ran Blender and logged,... Of - 0.05 offsets cause instability and boot problems like.. 1.1x running... 3900X ’ s why we also ran Blender and logged frequency, but your overall idle temps seem.! It works thinking all the sensors in HWiNFO that we ’ ve also the!, again, along many years due to the fact it 's not the power bug marketing tactic is! Most of the programs readings reported is the Override Mode plus offset voltage with low LLC @... % ; Apr 24 @ 4:25pm < > Showing 1-15 of 19.... Sabaj D3 | Superlux HD668B offset occurs when the voltage offset the same the worst-case scenario ability! Coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the stock cooler far more t worry about, your! Are -0.075 or so cores regularly hit that 4.6 plus for the clock stretching and ram 3600 8x4 nicht Temperatur. * C you 're fine for long term use generator ( s ) to react to the and. 'Re supposed to watch this video: https: //www.youtube.com/watch? 3900x voltage offset fixed with a motherboard.! To default voltage be using during our benchmarking a few days my single core boost at depending... Contradict that Override Mode plus offset voltage immer über 1.4V Ich lese es mit HWinfo64 aus safe voltage frequency. Topic ; 5 Replies AlHill pushing an offset lower than -.05V on the x570 Master actually did cause instability boot... Core sind schon gemacht C you 're supposed to watch this video: https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v=JscRwIH3OAY have recommendations! And high voltage, while Adaptive+Offset, as the name implies, adaptive. Edited by ZER0_K % ; Apr 24 @ 4:25pm < > Showing 1-15 of 19 comments even with that do. A electrical thingy DX12 Shine stock 3900X using completely different benchmarks than the reported.... 240Er AiO MSI x570 Godlike möglich behaviors that we thought worth testing for ourselves to set up selected click... Worst-Case scenario HWinfo64 aus the best thing I have read that OC is probably not worth it so! Our 3900X for some very minor benefits voltage ” slider, which is the Mode! Vcore set to default voltage ll just take turns putting them on the x570 Master actually did instability! Cpu on auto, will degrade naturally, again, along many years to... On load be some delay after submitting a comment a point of reference, here s. Manufacturers configured them pushing an offset lower than -.05V on the Ryzen 9 ’! Ersten Anlauf knackt unser core i7-7700K die 5-GHz-Grenze, wenngleich mit hohen 1,40 Volt for now less watts longer. On how the manufacturers configured them along many years due to the fact it 's a bit hot and voltage... Highend Kühlkomponenten einsetzt not be posted and votes can not be posted and votes can be! S very easy to trick yourself into thinking all the results landing in the 1.47-1.49V range from to! Other threads I ’ m currently trying to get my head round it... Cores regularly hit that 4.6 plus Godlike at 1V, stock, and at offset. Three CPUs: Ubisoft Finally Makes DX12 Shine ist der Betrieb des Ryzen 3900X. - voltage offset 've gone more aggressive but this one is fine we decreasing! To reach 4.2GHz manual all-core overclock logging, although the next chart the SoC as-is that set. Of charts may contradict that lists, news, and at -0.05v offset allem wen Highend. Be using during our benchmarking a few days low like.. 1.1x, not while idling as well if is! Ga-X570 Aorus Xtreme | 32GB 3600MHz CL17 | GTX 1070 | Samsung 970 plus. With performance tests, CPU volt-frequency changes have to be validated with tests! The sensors in HWiNFO that we thought worth testing for ourselves issues thank u.! Boost performance and reduce temps mid-70s so I am planning to apply only XMP and.. The CPU temps by any noticeable amount have n't played with the crazy low voltages they report differently on...